An Appeal to Parents of San Diego City Public School Students – Stop the Lies About Islam – Bài cập nhật kiến thức mới nhất năm 2024
The theocratic ritualistic practices of Islam, as required by Mohammad the 6th Century founder of the theocratic-political system of belief incorrectly referred to as a religion, are a convoluted mixture of man-made commandments, retractions, and contradictions. The word Islam is literally defined as meaning “submission,” and the Koran, the Islamic book of scripture, is a book of violent verses that requires devout Muslims to observe a law of “abrogation” established by Mohammad in the late 6th Century A.D. Abrogation, defined in Koran 9:2 by Mohammad, is a verse mandating that devout Muslims forget and repent of their brotherly kindness and the principle of loving their non-Muslim neighbors and, instead, seek out infidels (Christians, Jews, and all other non-Muslims) in order to force them into submission before the Islamic god Allah. The verses 9:1 through 9:18 emphasizing “repentance” expand the basic command in 9:2, as shown below:
“When the sacred months are over kill the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way; God is forgiving and compassionate.”
There are over 100 verses in the Koran that follow 9:2, describing the vicious and ruthless methodologies to be used by devout Muslims for forcing the idolater, infidels, into, either, submission or death. Freedom of religious belief was, and is, not permitted under the doctrine of Islamic abrogation and shariah law. Abrogation actually meant the sudden, extreme, and permanent change from what was practiced by Mohammad in the city of Mecca to what was, later, practiced in the city of Midina; that is, zero toleration for, and hatred of, anyone not in submission to Islam. This is the fundamental doctrine of Islam that led to the Mohammadan barbarism of the 6th Century A.D. This fundamental doctrine of Islam, abrogation, is the accepted rule for all 21st Century Muslim nations, which maintain theocracies of political and theological control, dictatorships, over the lives of the devout Muslims under their domination, called caliphates.
The drastic differences in the way two different Muslims, one in the USA and one in, let’s say Afghanistan, can read the Koran and construe the commands of Mohammad, point to a subtle, but yet distinct, application of subterfuge pointedly directed at non-Muslims in democratic nation-states. You see, the original application of the doctrines, rules, and laws of the Koran was intended by Mohammad for the “total” combined Muslim community, comprised exclusively of devoted Muslims, as a caliphate or theocracy (government by rule of the god Allah through holy Muslim men who interpret the Koran). For that reason, the command was given to all Muslims that they not make friendships with non-Muslims, and to only regard other devoted Muslims as friends and associates. The first, second, and third generation Muslims in the USA are greatly affected and conflicted, in their day-to-day lives, as to what they should actually believe, and do, about infidels, because of the law of abrogation, Koran 9:2, that appears to affect all subsequent verses connoting toleration for infidels, or nonbelievers. The words of the 2005 exposition of “al-wala-Wal-Bara” by Muhammad Qahtani Sheikh Abdar Razaq Afifi, deputy president of the department of Guidance and a member of the Board of Great Ulema of Saudi Arabia, declare the following:
“The subject matter is of paramount importance and utmost interest: Firstly, it is concerned with one of Islam’s main foundations, which has two major prerequisites of true faith: al-Wala is a manifestation of sincere love for Allah, his prophet and the believers; al-Bara is an expression of enmity and hatred toward falsehood and its adherents. Both are evidence of true faith. Secondly, it has been written at a very crucial time where Muslims are no longer aware of those qualities which distinguish the believers from the nonbelievers; their faith has become so weak; and they have taken the disbelievers as their friends while displaying enmity toward the believers.”
Qahtani’s English publisher has, however, noted a profound caveat attached to his words. “It is impossible to provide a literal translation in English of the al-Wala wal-Bara, but the meaning of this Arabic term indicated, on the one hand, drawing near to what is pleasing to Allah and His Messenger and, on the other hand, withdrawing from what is displeasing to Allah and His Messenger.”
This is where the application of “taqiyya” Koran 16:106 guides the motives of devoted Muslims as the basis for their apparent peaceful and tolerant behaviors toward non-Muslim infidels. In Koran 16:106, the proper translation appears as follows, note the blatant pragmatism of Islamic doctrine:
“None invents falsehoods save those who disbelieve God’s revelations: it is they that are liars. Those who are forced to recant while their hearts remain loyal will be absolved; but those who open their bosoms to unbelief shall incur God’s ire; and grievous punishments await them. That is because they love the life of this world more than the life to come; and God does not guide the unbelievers.”
The foregoing explication of” taqiyya” is accepted as the pragmatic approach to the domination of infidels. In the Hadith and Sira (personal statements made by the Islamic prophet) the following is regarded as “holy” guidance from Muhammad:
“Sahih Bukhari (52:269) – “The Prophet said, ‘War is deceit.'” The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad’s men after he “guaranteed” them safe passage.”
Sahih Bukhari (49:857) – “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.”
Sahih Bukhari (84:64-65) – Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permitted in order to deceive an “enemy.”
Sahih Muslim (32:6303) – “… he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).”
The application of the foregoing Hadith and Sira to Islamic law, accepted in all Shiite and Sunni nations is the following:
Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 – 8.2) – “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory… it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression… “
Therefore, the words and expressions of devout Muslims, residing among infidels in Western democratic nations, can really “only” be believed if those Muslims have actually, and honestly renounced the mandates of the Koran and traditional Islamic law. If Muslims claim total adherence to Islam, according to the Koran and Islamic tradition, they can’t be trusted to tell the truth to infidels. This premise leads to the crux and thrust of this essay article, which is the propagation of false statements about the “peaceful, loving, and tolerant doctrines of Islam by the American mainstream media, and proponents of Islam, as propaganda in the American public schools in order to indoctrinate non-Muslim public school children into believing the Islam is a religion of peace and love.
Recently, the administrators of the San Diego Unified School District proclaimed that the School District was going to engage in a formal concerted effort to teach (indoctrinate) San Diego school children about the religion of Islam in order to refute “Islamophobia.” Independent Reporter Gary Warth wrote an article about the district measure, in which he stated, “San Diego Unified School District administrators and teachers will have calendars showing Islamic holidays, students will learn more about the religion in social studies classes and safe places will be created on campuses for Muslim students as part of a multi-tiered approach to combat Islamophobia. Trustees on Tuesday voted 4-0, with board member Michael McQuary absent, to approve a plan to confront Islamophobia and bullying against Muslim students.”
The approach that the San Diego City school district has planned is to “force” all elementary, middle-school, and high school students to attend classes that will disseminate information about Islam and shariah law, which will contain none of the facts that have been heretofore delineated in this article; but will contain information, or propaganda, that will paint a portrait of Islam in the minds of children of a “religion,” not a theocratic-political system, that contains doctrines promoting only peace, love, and toleration for Jews, Christians, and all other non-Muslims. And guess who is providing the material about Islam that is to be presented, as curricula by classroom teachers? It is none other than that Islamic organization that has been declared by the USDOJ as an “unindicted terrorist co-conspirator,” CAIR. The following information has been published widely about CAIR from the Internet’s “Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT):”
“There’s another letter circulating on Capitol Hill affirming federal law enforcement’s belief that the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is the product of a Hamas-support network in the United States. Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich sent the letter last month to four members of Congress who asked for details last fall on how CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the terror-finance trial against the Holy Land Foundation and its former officials. He included trial transcripts and exhibits “which demonstrated a relationship among CAIR, individual CAIR founders, and the Palestine Committee. Evidence was also introduced that demonstrated a relationship between the Palestine Committee and HAMAS, which was designated as a terrorist organization in 1995.” Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, and trial exhibits show the Brotherhood created the Palestine Committee. CAIR officials adamantly deny any involvement with either Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood. The Weich letter, however, shows that the Department of Justice has not wavered in its conclusion that the internal records it possesses prove a connection.”
The fact that the San Diego Unified School District has previously denied Christian classroom teachers the opportunity of discussing Christianity and the doctrines of Jesus, contained in the Holy Bible, during class periods shows a blatant and hypocritical disdain for the dissemination of factual religious truth. While the Christian parents of children in this large school district are obviously being kept out of the loop of authorization for such an egregious act of “filling the minds of impressionable preadolescents and adolescents with lies about the truth doctrines of Islam,” I hope that this essay article will to educate and unite those parents in a collective barrage against this ruthless attempt at perverse indoctrination and statism.
Why am I particularly concerned about the status of the San Diego Unified School District? Well, besides the fact that I was a San Diego County deputy sheriff during the 1980s, and lived and worked in San Diego County for over ten years. I currently have five grandchildren who are living in the San Diego North County, in the Oceanside, Carlsbad, Vista tri-city area, who are currently enrolled in the public schools. Furthermore, as the political expression states, “as it goes in New York and California, so it goes for the rest of the nation,” the same applies to education in San Diego County; “what goes for the San Diego City school system eventually goes for all school districts in San Diego County.” I do not want to see my grandchildren indoctrinated with false information about Islam through a mandated propaganda system of religious indoctrination.
As far as the term “Islamiphobia” is concerned, the similar use of the term “homophobia” was formally applied to anyone who has a conscious repulsion for the 6,000 year old psycho-sexual disease of homosexuality. In the 1980s, after 6,000 years of homosexuality being declared as a deviant and filthy pathology and social practice, it was, by political fiat, formally declared as a viable lifestyle in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders II (DSM III). Islamiphobia is a very similar aberrational terminology that has been created and applied to anyone who has a conscious fear of Islamic subterfuge, which was coined as a means of pragmatically turning the belief of the truth about fundamental Islamic doctrine into an irrational fear, or phobia. It is currently much like what would be an effort to make felonious pedophilia (sexual relations by adults with small children) into a lifestyle and the creation of a terminology “pedophiliaphobia” as a means of making anyone with a repulsion against the awful sickness and crime of pedophilia an irrational aberration. With the devastating effect of a vile propaganda campaign of lies by the mainstream electronic media, such is entirely probable. As it was done for homosexuality and perverse homosexual marriage, with enough political support by vile supporters, bestiality, pedophilia, and sadomasochism might also be one day declared as lifestyles.
My appeal in this article is to all the Christian, Jewish, and other non-Muslim parents of San Diego Unified School District children, for their collective efforts to get this Islamic propaganda indoctrination effort nipped in the bud before it is actually implemented. Certainly, if the School District will penalize and castigate teachers who present the truth about Jesus in the classroom, that love, respect, compassion, and toleration for all mankind is the substrate to Christian doctrine, but allow lies to be told in the classroom to falsely represent Islamic doctrine, demonstrable outrage should emerge from of the district’s non-Muslim parents. God willing, it will happen!
Kết thúc
Ngoài các bài viết tin tức, bài báo hàng ngày của SEMTEK, nguồn nội dung cũng bao gồm các bài viết từ các cộng tác viên chuyên gia đầu ngành về chuỗi kiến thức Kinh doanh, chiến lược tiếp thị, kiến thức quản trị doanh nghiệp và kiến thức quản lý, phát triển tổ chức doanh nghiệp,.. được chia sẽ chủ yếu từ nhiều khía cạnh liên quan chuỗi kiến thức này.
Bạn có thể dành thời gian để xem thêm các chuyên mục nội dung chính với các bài viết tư vấn, chia sẻ mới nhất, các tin tức gần đây từ chuyên gia và đối tác của Chúng tôi. Cuối cùng, với các kiến thức chia sẻ của bài viết, hy vọng góp phần nào kiến thức hỗ trợ cho độc giả tốt hơn trong hoạt động nghề nghiệp cá nhân!
* Ý kiến được trình bày trong bài viết này là của tác giả khách mời và không nhất thiết phải là SEMTEK. Nhân viên tác giả, cộng tác viên biên tập sẽ được liệt kê bên cuối bài viết.
Trân trọng,
Các chuyên mục nội dung liên quan
- Bản tin số mới nhất | Góc chia sẻ kiến thức số hóa & Chiến lược kinh doanh
- Trang chủ
- Marketing tổng thể
- Kiến thức WordPress
